Support CleanTechnica's work through a Substack subscription or on Stripe.
A couple of months ago, I wrote this article on the new war in Iran’s impact on global auto sales, and today I’m writing this to update those observations.
Iran War Update
Little has changed in the last two months. We appear to be at a stalemate. The US doesn’t want to admit defeat by leaving, nor do they have any viable military options. They could blow up a lot of things in Iran, but that is unlikely to cause them to surrender and Iran seems to have an ability to cause a lot of damage to our allies (both Israel and the Gulf states). They appear to have the ability to control the Strait of Hormuz for as long as they want and have the ability to close the Bab El-Mandeb Strait with the help of their friends in Yemen if things escalate. The three options I see are (paraphrased from Jeffrey Sachs’ comments in the video above):
- Trump escalates the war, which he and I agree will cause the price of oil to go up significantly as oil production facilities of several countries are likely impacted for the next few years.
- Stalemate continues. I think oil prices will rise somewhat, but analysts that see $200 a barrel oil and $10 a gallon gasoline underestimate people’s ability to reduce their quantity of oil demanded by carpooling, taking their smaller car, or taking public transportation in the short term and buying a electric car in the longer term.
- Trump pulls out of Iran, declaring victory (a lie, but he is a good liar). This should allow oil and gas to gradually return to slightly higher prices (because of some war damage) than they were before the war.
In all three scenarios, the world sees the tremendous value of accelerating its transition to solar, wind, and batteries (even if imported) and from gas and diesel vehicles to electric vehicles. Unfortunately, the first scenario and to a lesser extent the second are much better for the clean energy transition, but worse for the world’s stability. So, even though it is the worst for the transition, I would favor us pulling out of Iran. I still have confidence the tremendous innovation in clean technology will drive the world to adopt it, even without the high oil prices caused by this war. On the other hand, if Trump takes either of the first two options, this is at least a silver lining to his folly.
China & The Rest Of The World
China has tremendous capacity to build cars of all types (gas, hybrid, battery electric). Most would say overcapacity, but if they are able to export those affordable efficient cars of all types, they can use this crisis to increase their market share. According to a recent CleanTechnica report on China auto sales, the country has hit a record 63% of vehicle sales being New Energy Vehicles (NEV) — which is mostly BEVs, but also some plug-in hybrids. This came even as EV sales were down, as gas car sales suffered a greater decline. The 26% rise in the cost of gasoline has to be a big part of that shift to NEV, but credit should also be given to continued price reductions and increases in charging speeds in the available vehicles.
China is doing a great job at finding foreign markets (basically everywhere but the US) for its vehicles, both gas and NEV. This doesn’t force people in those countries to buy an electric or hybrid vehicle, but it gives them good electric and hybrid choices and they will figure it out over the next few years without incentives nor subsidies. It punishes the Japanese, German, Korean, and US manufacturers that have been slow to electrify. Korean manufactures have done a better job of electrifying than the other three, but still not quite as well as China.
United States
Gas prices in the US are up 40.6% since the start of the war. If consumers in the United States had the ability to buy affordable electric cars from China, I’m convinced our EV share would be far higher than the 6% in the first quarter that it apparently was. (And, according the this report, things didn’t get better in April.) The problem, of course, is that most major manufacturers (with the notable exceptions of Tesla and Kia/Hyundai) have reduced their EV offerings since the US EV tax credit and fuel economy mandates were repealed. This has left most dealers with only hybrids to sell to customers looking to reduce their fuel bills, which explains the 33% jump in May hybrid sales over last year.
The biggest surprise that I saw when looking at the recent US EV sales charts was that the Toyota BZ was the third best selling EV in the US in the first quarter, even edging out Chevrolet with its Equinox EV and Hyundai with the IONIQ 5! I guess Toyota decided now was the time to lower the price, increase the power and range, add the NACS port, and increase availability. Maybe Toyota is starting to realize it needs to have a decent EV in this new environment, but it is odd this all came out after all the laws changed.
I am surprised that the new Nissan LEAF that won so many awards isn’t selling better. I checked some listings at local dealers and there are plenty available, and they were even offering discounts up to $5,000 on them. I do think the brand is a little tarnished from all of the very low lease offers last year while the tax credit was still available. I see you can get a low-mileage (under 20,000 miles) 2024 LEAF for $15,000 to $20,000, and although it doesn’t have all the features of the new LEAF, that is a great price for a nearly new car! I know a guy who talked four friends and relatives in one day into leasing a new LEAF in Colorado for $19 a month. Many people could use an extra car at that price! I asked him a year later if those four were happy with their deal. All were except one. One of the people is putting a lot of miles on the car and will get a big fee for going over the allotted mileage when they turn the car in. You can’t blame Nissan for that.
The new Chevrolet Bolt may also generate an increase in EV sales. I’m hopeful it will be a big enough success that GM will change its mind about discontinuing the car. Unfortunately, I checked local listings and, like the new LEAF, availability was good and dealers are offering discounts up to $5,000.
If you want to take advantage of my Tesla referral link to get 3 months Full Self Driving, here’s the link: https://ts.la/paul92237 — but if another owner helped you more, please use their link instead of mine.
Disclosure: I am a shareholder in Tesla [TSLA] and XPeng [XPEV]. But I offer no investment advice of any sort here.
Sign up for CleanTechnica's Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott's in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
CleanTechnica's Comment Policy
Facts Only
The U.S. is in a stalemate with Iran, with no clear military or diplomatic resolution.
Three potential outcomes are identified: war escalation, continued stalemate, or U.S. withdrawal.
Oil prices are expected to rise significantly if the war escalates, impacting global oil production.
China’s vehicle sales now include 63% New Energy Vehicles (NEVs), primarily battery electric and plug-in hybrids.
Gasoline prices in China have risen 26%, contributing to the shift toward NEVs.
Chinese automakers are expanding exports of affordable gas, hybrid, and electric vehicles globally.
U.S. gas prices have increased 40.6% since the start of the Iran war.
U.S. EV sales were 6% of total vehicle sales in Q1, with hybrid sales rising 33% in May.
Toyota’s BZ EV was the third best-selling EV in the U.S. in Q1, outperforming Chevrolet and Hyundai models.
Nissan’s LEAF is available with discounts up to $5,000, but sales remain low.
Chevrolet’s Bolt is also discounted, but GM plans to discontinue the model.
The author is a shareholder in Tesla and XPeng but offers no investment advice.
Executive Summary
The ongoing conflict involving Iran has created a stalemate with three potential outcomes: escalation leading to higher oil prices, continued stalemate with moderate price increases, or a U.S. withdrawal with gradual price normalization. Each scenario impacts global auto sales, particularly accelerating the shift toward electric vehicles (EVs) due to rising fuel costs. China has capitalized on this shift, with 63% of its vehicle sales now being New Energy Vehicles (NEVs), including battery electric and plug-in hybrids. Chinese automakers are expanding into global markets, offering affordable EVs and hybrids, which pressures traditional manufacturers in Japan, Germany, Korea, and the U.S. to electrify faster.
In the U.S., gas prices have surged 40.6% since the war began, but EV adoption remains low at 6% in Q1, partly due to limited affordable options. Hybrid sales have risen 33% as consumers seek fuel-efficient alternatives. Toyota’s BZ EV has gained traction, while Nissan’s LEAF and Chevrolet’s Bolt face challenges despite discounts. The article suggests that without Chinese EV imports, U.S. adoption rates could be higher, highlighting the role of policy and market dynamics in shaping the transition to cleaner transportation.
Full Take
The strongest version of this narrative highlights the geopolitical and economic pressures accelerating the global shift toward electric vehicles. The Iran conflict serves as a catalyst, exposing vulnerabilities in oil-dependent economies and reinforcing the strategic value of renewable energy and EVs. China’s dominance in affordable NEVs positions it as a key player in this transition, while U.S. and European automakers lag due to policy shifts and slower electrification efforts. The analysis acknowledges the complexity of the situation, balancing the benefits of cleaner technology against the instability of prolonged conflict.
Patterns detected: none
Root cause: The narrative assumes that geopolitical instability and oil price volatility will inevitably drive EV adoption, but it understates the role of infrastructure, consumer behavior, and policy consistency. The focus on China’s market gains frames the transition as a competitive race rather than a collaborative global effort, which may oversimplify the systemic challenges of decarbonization.
Implications: If oil prices remain high, consumers may adopt EVs faster, but affordability and charging infrastructure remain barriers. The U.S. risks falling behind in the global auto market if it doesn’t incentivize EV production and adoption. Second-order effects include potential job losses in traditional auto sectors and increased dependence on Chinese manufacturing.
Bridge questions: How might U.S. policy shifts (e.g., reinstating EV tax credits) alter the competitive landscape? What role do consumer preferences play in the transition, beyond price sensitivity? Could a coordinated global effort to stabilize oil markets slow the EV transition, or would it merely delay the inevitable?
Counterstrike scan: A coordinated influence campaign might exaggerate the benefits of EVs while downplaying infrastructure challenges, or frame China’s dominance as a threat to push protectionist policies. The article does not align with this pattern, as it presents a nuanced view of both opportunities and obstacles in the transition.
Sentinel — Human
The text is highly opinionated and blends high-level geopolitical analysis with granular consumer market data, exhibiting a clear human voice and specific, non-generic anecdotal evidence.