Image: spacedaily.com · rights & removal
A Quebec amateur astronomer was scouting a campsite using satellite imagery in 2024 when he spotted a 25-kilometre ring around Lake Marsal, and geologists who reached it by floatplane the following year found shatter cones confirming a roughly 390-million-year-old impact structure now provisionally named Uhackatik
Reporting by Space DailyRead the original at spacedaily.com
Executive Summary
Facts Only
* An amateur astronomer noticed a nearly circular pattern of ridges around Lake Marsal in Quebec in 2024.
* The feature was roughly 25 kilometers across.
* The observation was submitted via Impact Earth, a reporting channel run by Gordon Osinski.
* A research team confirmed the structure by flying into the site in October 2025.
* Researchers collected physical evidence, including shatter cones and impact melt rock.
* Laboratory analysis suggests the impact occurred in the Devonian period, approximately 390 million years ago.
* The present shape is the result of erosion over 390 million years.
* The feature is provisionally named Uhackatik.
* The research team plans to present results at the Meteoritical Society meeting.
* Impact cratering is a fundamental geological process across the Solar System.
* Roughly 200 impact craters are confirmed on Earth, compared to an estimated two million-plus on the Moon.
Full Take
From the original · Space Daily
In 2024, the amateur astronomer was planning a camping trip in Quebec’s Côte-Nord region and scrolling through satellite imagery when a nearly circular pattern of ridges caught his attention, arranged around a body of water called Lake Marsal.Read the full story at spacedaily.com
Sentinel — provisional
No strong signs of machine writing were found in the source article. Provisional estimate, not a finding that a person wrote it.
The text reads like high-quality investigative reporting, skillfully weaving specific, verifiable field details with broader astronomical and geological context.
This looks only at the wording of the original source article, not at this page's AI-written sections. A small local AI model made this estimate. It has not been checked against known human and machine texts, so treat it as provisional. It cannot show who wrote an article.
